I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
也是时候想一想，我们到底想要什么样的邮轮？是复制欧美的成熟模式，还是探索属于中国人的“航海生活”？
，详情可参考同城约会
3 directories, 3 files
Москвичей предупредили о резком похолодании09:45
disappears when extract returns.